Category: Three in the Key (Page 2 of 2)

3 in the Key: Spurs v Kings

In the third installment of 3 in the Key™, Trace Ronning and Andrew Flores discuss the 12th game of the season, the Spurs 110-105 win on the road against the Sacramento Kings.

Let’s start with Trace’s three key takeaways…

Have you ever heard anyone say, “It’s not how you start. It’s how you finish”?

Nobody has ever said that to this collection of San Antonio Spurs.

The Spurs led by 18 with 5:56 to go. And they led by 18 with 2:49 to go. And yet, San Antonio ended up winning by just 5 points.

“A win is a win is a win,” head Coach Gregg Popovich would say if you asked him about his team just eeking out a victory. But behind closed doors, I’m going to guess several third stringers got roasted.

You know who won’t get roasted? The starting five, which leads me into my three takeaways from last night.

#1: The starters are figuring out how to play together

San Antonio was without Danny Green for the first couple weeks of the season. They were also (and are still) without Tim Duncan. They added Pau Gasol. So until last week, the Spurs’ starting five had played 0 games together, and it showed in home losses against the Rockets and Clippers.

Last night, the Spurs’ starting five outscored the Kings starting five 80-48 – the monstrosity known as DeMarcus Cousins had 26 of those 48 – and all but Green scored double digits. Danny finished with 9 pts and played excellent wing defense, per usual. I believe this is a good sign for the future of the Spurs, and not just the Kings being awful – which they are, most certainly.

#2: The bench has figured out how not to play together

So, hopefully that means they’ll stop doing it. Nobody on the Spurs’ bench finished with a positive +/- other than Davis Bertans, who played some nice defense besides some silly fouls on Cousins. Bertans also made some nice threes, but has plenty of room for improvement. I still really like the effort shown by David Lee and Patty Mills, who were -9 and -12, respectively, but this was an unimpressive night by the San Antonio bench.

Of course, +/- isn’t a comprehensive look at the way players perform (both Lee and Mills being prime examples). And maybe it’s unfair to compare this bench to the championship-winning 2013-14 team or the two seasons that followed, but without a reliable bench, it’s going to be hard to make a deep playoff run.

#3: When Kawhi makes his threes, he’s unstoppable

I honestly don’t think that’s hyperbole. What are defenders supposed to do when Kawhi Leonard is on target from behind the arc? Grow an extra pair of arms and legs? You have to respect everything Leonard does on the court, because he can do everything on the court, which hardly ever puts you in the best position to take away any one of the things Leonard can do to score.

I envy nobody who lines up against him at any point of the game.

If he could only figure out how to get to the free throw line half as often as James Harden… can you even imagine?

And now let’s welcome Andrew Flores back to the Spurs Dynasty fold…

#1: Pau Gasol is a Bad Mamma Jamma

As a long time fan of the Timmy “sneaky-sneaky” style of collecting 3000+ blocks, I was delighted to see #16, Pau Gasol, own the league’s most talented center, DeMarcus Cousins. Pau is a baller, folks. His offense is reliable and his defense is cunning.

However, what most impresses me about the Spurs steal of the off-season is his toughness. You’ve seen it – that scowl on his face is like a man who is headed into the Running of the Bulls. His determined leadership is contagious. After a three-game losing streak, I saw a different style of play on both ends of the floor that I contribute to the current winning streak. Knowing that Pau is just being Pau, don’t be fooled into making comparisons to Duncan, no matter how seamlessly his game is working out within the system in the first 10 games.

#2: Pop is always in Mad Scientist mode

Sure, Pop… let’s make the game stretch past even longer into my bedtime with your 3rd string v 1st string 3-minute drill. Watching this squad is as awkward as watching a “good game’ moment between Durant and Westbrook. Bertans playing ‘center’ is the kind of crazy that makes me wonder what goes on inside of Coach Pop’s head. I understand giving the D-League players a chance to understand the pace and competition of a starting 5. Watching them play reminds me how important team chemistry is in the NBA. Still, tip of the hat to you, Mr. Popovich, for doing what no other coach in the League would ever attempt. Who says the Spurs are a boring team?

#3: Manu is on a personal streak for “Amazing Shot” per game

I was at first skeptical anbout the Spurs paying $14 million for Manu Ginobili’s single season contract. It’s easier to justify when Manu is the recipient, especially in the wake of the retirement of the GOAT. I told myself that for years the Spurs had Manu in the payroll at a deal and this was a gesture of payback. However, look at his stats and he’s putting up some very efficient numbers. He’s been giving us flashes of the old X-factor that we normally rely on The Juice to provide off the bench, sick moves that I have to rewind and watch again, to make sure my eyes weren’t playing tricks on me. If the team can get this kind of effort on a night-to-night basis out of #20, the Spurs are going to be a tough team to beat.

3 in the Key: Spurs v Warriors

We’re debuting a new column this season on SpursDynasty.com. We’re calling it “Three in the Key.”

After key games, two of our analysts will outline their three key takeaways.

We kick things off with Stephen Hale and Trace Ronning’s takes on the Spurs’ season opener against the Warriors. First, let’s hear from Stephen…

1. It’s just one game

This argument is rubbish. The Warriors will get a huge pass on this massive “L” to start the season. That’s understandable, I guess. It is one game. But the San Antonio Spurs have seven new players on their roster. They are also in the post-Duncan era, after having a team defined by him for 20 years. They were missing their starting shooting guard and they were on the road. The Spurs were prepared. Why weren’t the Warriors? I think this speaks to a larger issue: the Warriors might be talented, but lack mental toughness. The Spurs might have both. Also, it’s not just one game. The Spurs now lead the season series, which could impact home-court advantage in the playoffs.

2. That bench though…

… has the potential to be really good. Maybe it was just in comparison to the Warriors bench, which is just flat-out awful. But good Lord, they looked great. Simmons will get the majority of the praise and rightly so. He’s pretty awesome and I’m not sure we will see a better dunk than the one to end the game. But 39-year-old Manu Ginobili and 33-year-old journeyman David Lee were also effective. Lee had a play in the 2nd half where he single-handedly out fought three Warriors for a tipped ball, which eventually landed in Manu’s lap for a layup. I thought Dedmon got some
incredibly useful minutes. He’s long and fast. And Patty Thrills is still Patty Thrills. He hasn’t skipped a beat. The bench was incredible, is good, and could be the best in the league. That’s all I am saying.

3. Kawhi Leonard is really good

I got into an argument the other day with a guy who thinks Kawhi isn’t a top 5 player and would take Paul George over him, easily. Well, that guy is an idiot. Kawhi Leonard is dangerously close to becoming the best player in the entire league. He did it all last night. He set a career high with 35 points and got to the line a ridiculous 15 times and made them all. He hung in the air, he made fadeaways, he attacked, he dunked. He had five steals. Five steals?!?! That’s nuts guys. He’s quiet (although, he’s getting louder) and not flashy, so he gets forgotten about by fans… except by everyone that he plays. Your friends at the water cooler will tell you he isn’t that good. They guy at the rec league will blow him off. I’m sure some maroon will tell you that Paul George is better. Just ignore that. They don’t know anything.

Now let’s kick the ball to Trace…

We’re officially 1/82nd of the way through the NBA season, and while I’m not one to read too much into the standings this early, it’s worth pointing out that the Spurs are tied for 1st in the West, and the Warriors are tied for last. It’s just math, folks. Yes, that’s right, in case you somehow missed it, the Spurs opened the season in Oakland against the new-look Super Warriors and completely demolished them, 129-100.

1. Kawhi was not overwhelmed by the moment

The knock against Kawhi Leonard is that he has played Houdini in each of the Spurs’ last two playoff oustings. I think it’s been a fair criticism and many NBA folks seem to think it’s the only thing standing between Leonard and true superstardom. We shouldn’t rush to judgment after just one game, but Kawhi didn’t shy away from the pressure of facing the Super Warriors in Oakland in the season opener and that’s something to be optimistic about.

He not-so-Kawhi-etly (get it?) dropped 35 pts on 10-21 shooting, made all 15 FTs, and made 5 steals. My personal favorite was Leonard swiping the ball from Curry at halfcourt and then driving to the rim and finishing over Durant on the other end. It was like if Kawhi was Luke Skywalker destroying the first Death Star, except he didn’t need any last-second Han Solo bullshit to get the job done.

Leonard did miss all three of his 3-pt attempts, however. Here’s to hoping that’s nothing to worry about – it was only three attempts after all.

2. LaMarcus doesn’t look like a defensive liability

And he picked a helluva time to show it. Never known as a rim protector, Aldridge seemed to do just fine in game one of the post-Duncan era. He wasn’t credited with any blocks, but he wasn’t afraid to get in the paint and contest shots. Sure, Golden State scored 100 points and we don’t typically think of giving up 100 points as a solid defensive effort, but I’d like to see how many times this Warriors team scores 100 or fewer points this season. It won’t be many. This was a good defensive effort by the Spurs.

Aldridge also picked up eight of San Antonio’s 21 offensive rebounds on the night, which led all players and matched Golden State’s total. That led to 26 second chance points for the Spurs, compared to just four for the Warriors.

3. The Spurs bench is better than yours

It’s still plastered on the side of the Oracle Arena and various Bay Area billboards, but their “Strength in Numbers” motto is just a facade this year. They ran nearly all of their depth out of town in order to bring Kevin Durant on board, and for at least one game, it showed. The Spurs’ annually great bench unit, led by the now-infamous Jonathan Simmons, Patty Mills, and the ageless Manu Ginobili, outscored Golden State’s bench 54-16.

54-16!!

The Warriors’ starters account for 84% of their total points last night. I’m not so sure that’s a viable strategy, night in and night out.

Newer posts »